Users are not always smart in knowing what is best for them, especially when they are not trained in good design where form, function and aesthetics are put hand-in-hand. People do not always know what is better for themselves and they will keep choosing the wrong thing in many cases. How wrong they are, and now I am so glad Apple is succeeding. So yeah all your BS are invalid. The ribbon in explorer expose commands circa… can you explain how the finder can do the same with its minimalistic style?
Look way back, way back to Windows 3. Look at the clutter of hierarchical menus and the way folder expand with little dotted lines that trace from the folder to the individual content icons. In other products too, Microsoft continues to like using nested hierarchies.
Operating System Guide: Windows vs. Mac (vs. Linux)
Think of how Hollywood films like to portray computer technology: flashing lights, status displays, status updates. The whole imagery while very cluttered makes it look VERY sophisticated and hence can give the user a false impression of being in control and being omnipresent. But it really is all just flashing lights and gizmos and gadgetry, high on the peacock display but not much really useful underneath. Microsoft and Linux varieties are often cluttered like this. I have been trying to understand WHY they continue to like this kind of busy-ness and WHY certain kinds of geeks like it.
My only explanation is what I said above: the clutter gives a false sense of sophistication and being in control. This why I am so glad that Apple exists because it combines function, form, and aesthetics all into one as their driving force for their design of software and hardware. Just looking at a typical computer hardware like say my monitor, a ViewSonic, I have to question WHY is the blue LED light in the front that indicates power-on so bright and shining right in my eyes? In fact, that blue LED light is very annoying, distracts me often from my actual monitor display and so I often use something to cover it up.
While I applaud Apple for their driving force design, I also really hope that other computer companies can pick up on working like Apple. Other companies, only if they follow suit, can succeed in such ways too. Such a pity. I hope with Tim Cook in the driving reign now that he really continues this sensibility in Apple. It seem to still be working for the majority of people. Every computer can copy, paste, and manage files and they all perform these tasks in the same simple way. Following that article you can show how iPads are being used in classrooms as teaching tools that are more cost effective than textbooks, etc..
MS Office already looks like this. Know what? I see what Microsoft is doing here. Regular users will not leave the touch UI and the power users get more power. The geekier Windows gets the more appealing it becomes to that segment of the market that loves complexity and well, geekiness. Also, keeping Windows geeky keeps the IT departments busy helping the non-geeks. Windows is good for business. Apple is good for the user, and once the user starts calling the shots, all bets are off.
I see a little arrow type thing in the top right corner. I expect that will collapse the huge shortcut bar thing. Problem solved. If you ask me and you did in the article the windows screenshots look easier to use because of that. I very much prefer the Windows ribbon, which hides when not being used, and when needed, gives me easy access to the options I have available to me. And how can you compare the file explorer on Windows with the home screen of the iPad and think your comparing the vision of two future operating systems?
Compare the home screen of the iPad with the new Metro UI home screen at least. Bad thing I still have to deal with it in a lot of places for work. As a graphic designer who has been running Windows for 16 years I feel the same way when forced in to using OSX. Anyway, I fail to see how it is in any way relevant to the new user interface. All that means is a larger installed user base that will be annoyed by these awful, drastic changes. Mcdonalds sells literally billions of burgers. Just the most convienant.
I recently installed the new version of office. I now have four somewhat redundant ways to manipulate files menus, toolbars, ribbons and right click. The defaults are horrible as they seem to require use of all four systems to do fairly basic file manipulations. I have done some customisation, but then find that I have to restore items to the ribbons because there seems to be no way to access the functionality via a menu, etc.
There is also an annoying tendency for the different programs within the office suite to do routine things in different ways. It may be that this is all my fault, but from a business perspective, it is stupid for a company to design an interface that induces foul language and spontaneous rants to anyone who strays near my office about the stupidity of Microsoft and warnings about upgrading the office suite. OSX has a menu bar that is always there, thats how they can unclutter everything. Every button has a corresponding menu item, so even if you remove it you can still access it with the mouse or keyboard shortcut.
At least the windows example groups things by function. Please… Compare something that are the same… iOS is a mobile os, while the images from Windows 8 is the file manager like finder. You can hide ribbons. And ribbons are a clever idea to get rid of the old plain menus without icons.
Seems to me that every Mac fanboy and girl goes out of their way to bash Microsoft every chance they get.
Windows 8 vs Mac OS X Mountain Lion head-to-head review
Once you get use to ribbon interface it makes sense. There are some things windows does better and some things that mac does better. Just lay off thinking that Mac is the only way to do things…it is not…deal with it. Totally agree. I work on PC with lots of files every day and having the icons at hand makes life much easier. I have iMac at home and not sure if hiding buttons really makes any sense. It looks pretty but does not make things easier!! MS ribbons can be hidden and modified so actually it is not cluttering as you can remove features and make it as tidy and easy to use as YOU want it… i buy apple for all my gadgets except computers i will stick to my PC thanks… i think people are being a little quick to slate the new OS although i do get a gut feeling it is going to be another vista failure you cannot judge an unreleased OS on a single screenshot of a fully loaded default browser menu… very single-minded.
I agree. I hated ribbon at first because it was new and different, but once I got used to it, made life SO much simpler. My only take is to get rid of the text descriptions under the icons and use mouse rollovers if you need to know what it does. Yeah, I freely admit to being an Apple fangirl, but seriously, this is why. I was shown the images for the new Windows Explorer and honestly could not believe how ridiculously convoluted and messy it looked.
I spread my books all over the floor. Same with my office desk. Bad analogy. The thing is this, why does it have to be cluttered?
Linux vs MAC vs Windows - Which One Is Better (Infographics)
What I want as a user is for MS to take this opportunity and listen to designers in order to streamline this system. After the publics reception there is no conceivable way Microsoft will release that garbage. Name required. Mail will not be published required. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction without explicit permission is prohibited. Tori says:. November 5, at pm. Mac Fans says:. July 16, at am. ZhapurLite says:. May 28, at pm. Mian Nasir Ahmad says:.
https://rinddetrlanmandtouch.tk March 27, at pm. Mike says:. March 21, at pm. MAC Fan says:. March 12, at pm. March 8, at pm. February 29, at am. Sam says:. February 27, at pm. MrElectrifyer says:. March 1, at am. FYI says:. January 21, at am. Lovely Windows says:. January 3, at am. Steve Nuts says:. December 15, at pm. Muoi Area says:. December 3, at pm. Run a Windows Phone 7. November 29, at am. October 27, at am. Get FocusWriter says:. September 30, at am.
J says:. September 19, at pm. Kuttyjoe says:. September 18, at pm. La babilonia delle Interfacce Utente. September 16, at am. Jordan says:. September 14, at pm. Particle Debris wk. September 4, at am. September 2, at pm. VLF says:. September 1, at pm. Phil says:. September 5, at am. September 1, at am. M says:. MLMcConnell says:. Mat says:. Costa says:. Matt says:. John says:.
August 31, at pm. Malik says:. Dean says:. LS says:. August 31, at am. Gary says:. Chris says:. Chip says:. December 16, at am. Johannes says:. JMH says:. Carl says:. Aquaria says:. December 10, at pm. Dudu says:. B30 says:. DiMaDo says:. God says:. August 30, at pm.
KimmoJ says:. R00f says:. Tech freak says:. Guanlik says:. Jim says:. KB says:. Angga says:. SteveP says:. September 2, at am. Ben says:. September 4, at pm. Christopher says:. January 5, at pm. Nate says:.
Grant says:. September 6, at am. Joseph says:.
- make python program executable mac!
- 10 reasons to get an Apple Mac instead of a Windows PC.
- kfc mac and cheese bites price.
Adrian says:. Jason says:. Exit, Inc. Darren says:. Whatever says:. Eric says:. Tom Karalias says:. RobbCab says:. Rob says:. Dickrichie says:. Paul says:. October 9, at am. Joshua K says:. David says:. Steve says:. FreeRange says:. DO Not Care says:. September 22, at am. Jiri says:. Windows is the mainstay of PCs everywhere. Windows is flexible in that regard, running everything from the latest games to ancient DOS Payroll software for corporations. You can buy a pre-built PC with Windows from hundreds of vendors, or build your own from scratch with thousands of different parts.
Given time, you can build a PC that fits all of your needs perfectly. That flexibility, though, comes at a price. People used to argue that Macs had no viruses. Some still do, although that statement is no longer true. Nevertheless, far fewer viruses exist for Mac and most Mac users get by just fine without any antivirus protection. While this may not last forever, and Apple doesn't have the best reputation when handling security issues , fewer viruses is a current and legitimate perk of OS X. Windows, on the other hand, suffers from more than just a few security exploits as reader Stego explains :.
With Windows, you have to stay on top of driver updates, security patches, Anti-Virus software still recommended for the Mac, mind, but it's a particular problem with Windows , etc. Windows is easily bogged down with clutter, bloatware, and memory munchers. Even though Windows can require a bit of maintenance , not every PC features bloatware such as the ones you build yourself and requires more updates than a Mac. Microsoft also handles security issues better and created Microsoft Security Essentials Windows Defender in Windows 8 to combat viruses easily.
While we feel Microsoft's offering fell behind its competition, plenty of free antivirus software exists and works great. Additionally, viruses don't account for some of our primary security concerns nowadays. As reader Strife Caecus points out , social engineering attacks and browser-based traps largely contribute to the overall problem:. What about social engineering attacks—where people are tricked into clicking on a link to install something malicious? Or installing extra browser toolbars? Or how about phishing sites? Is it assumed that the average Mac user is less likely to be duped by a social engineering attack?
From our standpoint, Mac users aren't more or less likely to fall for social engineering attacks and don't know of an accurate way of measuring that likelihood. While viruses still offer a considerable threat to Windows, security issues may become platform-agnostic in the future and render this argument irrelevant. Back in the 80s and 90s, Macs had a legitimate reputation as the first choice for designers because the selection of design applications was superior to what you could get on Windows PCs.
Nowadays you often see Macs in design firms likely due to their aesthetic or just out of habit. Both Windows and OS X feature plenty of great design apps, and high file compatibility between both platforms. As a result, you'll find more people who prefer designing on Windows despite the stereotype. Reader Scruffy Kitty prefers Windows for design due to its speed, device compatibility, and better multi-monitor support:. I often find with my Mac that I use at work slow and not fantastic at multitasking.
It is an iMac, fairly new, and it chugs through things my similarly priced laptop currently running Windows 8 does with ease. I've lost a lot of time at work waiting for my computer to start working and have learned that if I'm going to work on any hi-res art I should just bring my laptop in and transfer the files over when I'm done.
Many designers still prefer Apple hardware and OS X for their workflow. Because Macs are stereotypically seen more as the choice for artists regardless of whether or not that's actually accurate , software companies often target Macs for design-related tools. Additionally, OS X offers excellent font management out of the box and other built-in tools like Preview for quick conversion and other tasks. Both platforms have their pros and cons, but when it comes to the design argument you won't find a clear winner on either side. Like with most things, personal preference will dictate your choice here.
As mentioned earlier, official Apple hardware offers a paltry selection of graphics cards. While you'll find more and more popular games—including several unique titles—available for OS X, if you want a bleeding edge gaming experience you won't get it from a Mac. Few people elaborated on this argument, likely because it speaks for itself: You'll find fewer gaming options, hardware, and tools to fine-tune performance when using a Mac. Even if you build a hackintosh and get a powerful GPU, you're still fairly limited in regards to what you can do with it when running OS X.
Oftentimes, the same game will just run better in Windows than it will in OS X. Macs have a reputation of being the more intuitive choice. Apple would certainly like us to believe that, but if you ask a handful of Windows users you'll find that they consider the platform more intuitive in many ways. We believe it comes down to more what you're used to, or—if new to you're a brand new computer user—how your personal sensibilities affect your approach to either operating system.
Reader Strife Caecus offers a detailed explanation :. My assumption is if a user barely knows how to turn on a computer, they're going to go through the same growing pains learning what and how to click on things.
Contents: Mac vs PC
And if learning a UI [User Interface] is a struggle to begin with, then one will definitely have some issues switching from one OS to another. I've spent most of my years in Windows' UI. Were there some Mac-specific functions that annoyed me? Such as the one-button approach compared to the two-button PC approach. However, that's been resolved several years ago as now you can right-click on Mac for context menus. Many users are now used to the familiar Start Menu and taskbar icons.
The right-mouse button opens an extra menu of options and the scroll-wheel scrolls the page in various applications. With the advent of Windows 8, came the Start Screen. I approached the interface willing to learn since people in the future will be asking me how to use it. Many others have approached it much like Sweet Brown's famous meme statement Yes, I do spend most of my time on the Desktop.